Social Landscape Review: Q1 2012

Social Landscape Review Q1 2012

Connecting the dots is always easiest in hindsight, so let’s take a look at everything that shook out in Q1 of 2012 across the major social channels and between the relevant players in the space. Foursquare makes a fundamental shift in their value-prop, Facebook holds a marketing conference and changes everything for 850 million users, Pinterest continues its take-over, Google consolidates and rebrands a slew of services, and now everyone can take washed out photos right from their phone. Without further ado: Continue reading

Posted in Landscape Review Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Key Takeaways from the Facebook Marketing Conference: Timeline, Stories, & Marketing Products

“If the original Facebook was the first five minutes [of a conversation] and the stream was the next 15, what I want to show you today is the rest–the next few hours of a deep engaging conversation.” – Mark Zuckerberg, f8 2011

On September 22, 2011 we were presented with some groundbreaking platform updates and partnerships, which would shape the way we engage in social channels as end users, technical solution providers and marketers. Notably, a major release at the time was Timeline for Facebook users.

Working in the area of brand marketing, I find this quote from that release rings just as true with the announcement of the the brand Timeline and new products at fMC (Facebook Marketing Conference) in New York on February 29th. Continue reading

Posted in Events, Facebook

Social Activations Are Like Automobiles – There’s Something for Everyone

At the turn of the century (the last century — not this one), autos were failing left and right until Henry Ford introduced a new assembly line method for building mass-market automobiles, and the likes of Ferdinand Porsche honed the design and development of performance vehicles. In that same way, social activations are akin to automobiles. You have mass-market cars produced on an assembly line and you have handcrafted vehicles, built for specific performance objectives such as speed and luxury. Both serve a unique purpose and have their place in the market. Consumers in the market for a Porsche shouldn’t purchase a Ford and expect the same performance, and vice versa. The same thinking holds true in the process of procuring social solutions and technologies.

Sophisticated marketers that want real, meaningful, and measurable engagement don’t want an assembly line, “any color, as long as its black” solution, rather, they seek engagement mechanics that are specifically crafted and designed to meet the value proposition of engaging with their audiences.

However, the problem with those experiences is that most of those have not been developed with the proper thinking. The performance of custom social experiences over the past several years is more an observation on the maturity state of the industry, rather than the effectiveness of the type of solution. Carrying through the automobile industry analogy, the auto, itself, isn’t the failure, simply the lack of proper method.

Most custom social experiences to date have been designed without a rigorous process that marries business objectives with consumer desires and the appropriate deployment channels with the appropriate mechanics and functionality. In an effort to help marketers design better custom social experiences, we’ve codified our learnings from the design and development of over 500+ custom social experiences since 2007 into a holistic framework that provides validation and a roadmap for the execution of social programs.

A social page management and publishing tool, on its own, is fine for beginners who are just learning to understand social on Facebook, and it is needed to drive streamlined publishing and ongoing page management across markets; however, meaningful engagement comes across the engagement spectrum and needs to be customized to have any tangible benefit. Custom social experiences, one example being those that provide utility, do, and will, always have a place in the toolbox of marketers, so long as they are designed and executed to deliver business results.

We can all agree that success in marketing is set up by a well crafted and articulated social strategy and that social programs are more effective when supported by media. Furthermore, there is no silver activation bullet. Rather, there are various ways to successfully activate consumers through social channels. But, let’s move away from the discussion of activation tactics and put the focus on business results because this is the conversation that industry leaders need to converge on in 2012.

To move forward as an industry we all need to face the music and substantiate to executive teams the value of online social engagement spend beyond the superficial metrics of likes and followers. Whether a marketer is activating in social via a custom social experience, rich video content, or a crafty message that is deployed through a platform such as Buddy, Vitrue, Spreadfast et al, there is a need for a standardized way to measure social performance. Just as there are standards in the field of performance marketing, we need holistic measures and answers to questions such as:

  • What does success in Social mean to the CMO and what does her measurement dashboard look like?
  • How can an executive team correlate business outcomes to a brand’s activities in social channels?
  • And the holy grail: what is the ROI on the company’s overall spend in Social?

These are the challenges facing all of us in 2012. As with the automobile industry, there are numerous companies with different hypotheses and approaches, each building out separate models and platforms. It is the companies that deliver solutions to answer the above questions that will stand the test of time and win in the long run. However, this is not a zero sum game. This year will see more leading companies working together to set standards and bring best-of-breed solutions to market. As this New Year kicks into high gear, let’s challenge ourselves to, as an industry, elevate the discussion in 2012 to focus more on the metrics that matter.

Posted in Social Media Success Tagged , , ,

How To: 2012 Social Program Planning

Now that the NYE champagne has been emptied and your resolution resolve is already dissolving faster than an Alka-Seltzer, let’s look forward to 2012 and identify some steps for planning your brand’s social program calendar. At a high level, we want to assess a) the business objective(s) for the year, b) what those objective(s) translate into for social, c) the programs that we’ve run in the past, d) which of those programs were wildly successful or abominable failures, ande) how do we leverage those learnings in our proposed 2012 social programs calendar to accomplish the ends that we’ve set forth in a. Assuming you have a perfectly accurate picture of your brand’s last 12- to 24-months in social (tip: you don’t.) and you already know where you want to take the brand in the next 12- to 24-months, then you’ll only have to spend your time on step e, the actual program concepting. But if you don’t have a-d taken care of, you are setting your brand up for another year of possible wins, likely losses, and mediocrity in 2012. Best to start at the beginning then.

  1. Business Objective(s): What is your brand looking to accomplish in 2012? Are we expanding into a new market? Are we launching new products? Business objectives at this level tend to fall into only several categories - Awareness, Revenue, Engagement, Acquisition, Traffic (digital or foot) - and you can drill down into program-level objectives from there. We put the ‘s’ of ‘Objective(s)’ in parenthesis because we want to emphasize a focused approach, but there will no doubt be a few secondary objectives.
  2. How Objective(s) Translate to Social: Now that we’ve decided on our objective(s), determine how they translate into social. What does it mean that, more than anything in 2012, we want to ‘drive revenue?’ In that case, your social objectives may be to 1) get more consumers into your conversion funnel via social channels, 2) increase the average order value (AOV) via social channels, and/or 3) increase the number of opportunities for a social consumer to be exposed to your product or service. These social ‘translations’ of the objective(s) will help to crystalize the over-arching action items for the year.
  3. Past Social Programs: Take the major (and perhaps minor) initiatives in social for the last year or two, categorize them, and build your social program database. Make this database as thorough as necessary (try to lean towards ‘As Thorough As Possible’), attempting to get a complete picture of your brand’s experience in social over the last 12 to 24. If you have aunified interface for analyzing all of your social programs, fantastic; otherwise, you’ll have to manually compile and aggregate XLS data into a master set. Then, Approach//Solution//Results works well as a framework when compiling a slide deck of program snapshots. Having both the master social program database and the slide deck will set you up nicely for analyzing what worked and what didn’t.
  4. Wild Successes and Abominable Failures: Now, with that program database, analyze your KPIs based on the previous business objectives for the brand in social. This is when your Excel junkies (aka analysts) really come in handy – hopefully you’ve treated them well all year. Which programs were similar, and how did they perform program-over-program (POP)? Did your optimizations work, or were they ‘floptimizations’ (or did we continue to do the same thing over and over again expecting different results)? Take the highlights and lowlights, determine the ‘whys’ and the ‘why nots’, and with the now-updated social program master slide deck you’ll be fully armed to begin the actual concepting of your 2012 social programs.
  5. Use Program Analysis for Concept Calendar: And now for the fun part. Begin your program concepting, and sculpt a social program calendar based on those objectives we identified in a. For this, we use a framework called Program Identity Design (PID), which results in a PID Map – a fully-developed and packaged-up program concept that can be distributed to the entire team, from CMO down to the individual engineers, so that the purpose of the program is crystal clear across the business units. From here, you can plug several PID Maps into your social program calendar and know that what you’ve developed has integrity with your objectives and the overall direction of the business.

The above framework can take a few days, a week, a month, or longer, depending on your brand, rigor, and desired results. The take-away, though, is to not start at the end and simply throw a few concepts together in a slide deck; start at the beginning (that is, after all, usually the best place to start), so that your program concepts have integrity across your entire business. Anything else is just making the same old donuts.

Posted in Social Media Best Practices Tagged , ,

Social Landscape Review 2011 [INFOGRAPHIC]

The social landscape took an immense leap forward in 2011. It was a breakthrough year of enhancements, acquisitions, IPOs and an all-around competitive bout for all the major players in the ever-growing space. Lucky for you, we have created a robust summary of all the events that took place during this active year in Social. Continue reading

Posted in Landscape Review Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Social Landscape Review: Q4 2011

Here we go; the big 2011 wrap-up of changes to the social landscape. Dive in, remember, and look forward to 2012, as this year has been one filled with massive changes to the space, and the next promises to be just as big. For the rest of the year, check out Q1, Q2, and Q3. Enjoy! Continue reading

Posted in Landscape Review Tagged , , , , , , ,

Two Straightforward but Underused Social Program Amplification Strategies

I’m sure you’ve heard the line that the best customer is an existing customer. Well it’s true and this logic can be extended to your employees and/or your most loyal followers within social communities when it comes to amplifying your social programs. Think about it, for a company, employees are family and rabid customers are advocates. The two groups, when leveraged in the proper manner, can have an amazing impact on the amplification of any social program. The thing is that most companies aren’t yet in a position where they can mobilize their most valuable assets. Let’s look at the common barriers of each. Continue reading

Posted in Social Media

Program Identity Design: People’s Choice Awards

Social Design is a product strategy model that places users at the core of an experience. It allows products and brands to scale by incorporating a user’s trusted communities, driving conversation and creates a strong sense of identity through the experience. This is a model that Facebook has popularized in the development of their own platform by thinking from the inside out. Continue reading

Posted in Social Media Tagged , , ,

Localizing Social Experiences

When it comes to designing social experiences, one must take into account many factors – most importantly your consumer. Who are they? What are they doing? And, critical to this post, where are they? We have the opportunity to work with some of the largest brands in the world, and, as Uncle Ben almost said, with great size comes great scale. Designers of these social experiences need to build programs that exist on multiple platforms and devices, based on location and demographic, and a deep analysis of the consumer and their digital habits is required for the program itself to be a success.

When it comes to these local experiences, building and deploying an application or social microsite should be focused on the platforms that are most effective. For example:

  • When working with clients with a strong presence in Japan or China, Mixi and Ren Ren, respectively, need to be involved in the program build from the very beginning, as the functionality and mechanics of each platform vary and must be accounted for.
  • If the brand is popular in Brazil, then Orkut (60% Brazilian) and the brand’s .br site should be involved in the build.
  • When working in Canada, should the program be localized for Quebec and have a French language option (the Régie requires this if the program is a promotion)? Or do you build out a completely separate experience because the quebecoise don’t really like the whole “translation” thing; they’re a distinct people with their own culture and deserve their own separate experience, which must be accounted for.

The World Map of Social Networks – by Vincenzo Cosenza

However, when a campaign is global, and encompasses many nations and cultures, then how do we localize that experience so that it feels natural across each instance? Now we must understand business capabilities and restrictions.

For some clients, localizing an experience simply means translation of copy and creative within an experience and displaying the appropriate version to the appropriate user based on that user’s Facebook language settings. For others, we include language toggle options for the user, who may have a preference different than their default Facebook language settings, or we’ll verify via IP (which is less reliable).

Some clients have localized social content teams, whom we leverage when building out experiences that must be custom localized on a market-to-market basis. This creates added flexibility and requires a much more dynamic build to accommodate for multiple CMS back-end administration permissions and functionality. For retailers and service providers, for example, messaging and functionality may have to change based on region because shipping or service may not be available in all areas, but the brand will still want to message those folks for added awareness and viral spread through the Graph.

There are many ways to handle localization, but the good news is that we don’t have to guess at our solutions. In every case, the answer becomes apparent after we do a deep analysis of our client’s business requirements, business objectives, operational capabilities, and their consumer preferences.

This post originally appears on the Dachis Group Collaboratory.

Posted in Social Media Tagged , , , , , ,

A Holistic Framework for Program Identity Design

Since my earlier post on Brand Marketing Programs Made Social By Design there has been an up-swell in interest on our methodology for designing social programs. As such I’m going to open up the kimono further to provide a deep-dive into our Program Identity Design process.
The process is a set of calculated exercises which result in a program that has integrity; a program that marries business objectives with consumer wants and the appropriate deployment channels with the appropriate mechanics and functionality.

Design The Business Requirement

The first step in the process is to Design the Business Requirements. This step is broken down into two sub-steps, each having a set of distinct attributes: Design the High Level Business Objectives — business objective(s), business metric(s) and social metric(s), and then Design the Program Level Business Outcomes: these are open ended and dependent on the High Level Business Objectives.

Consumer Audit Reconciliation

Next comes the bridge that connects and ensures integrity between the first and second step, the Consumer Audit & Reconciliation. This involves an empathy mapping exercise wherein we dive into what the target consumer is hearing, thinking, seeing, saying, and feeling. The goal of this exercise is to come up with a set of Affinity Drivers that will frame the program from a consumer point of view.

Design The Program Frame

The second step is to Design the Program Frame. This step contains three sub-steps, each building on top of each other to arrive at a set of drivers that motivate the target consumer to engage and take the actions that will help to achieve the objectives of the business. Starting with a synthesis of the Affinity Drivers; to the development of the Interaction Driver Map–that correlates the importance of 5 general interaction drivers (Fame, Riches, Emotion, Utility, and Distraction) to consumer wants and program objectives by assigning each a percentage share that when all added together sums to one and then defining program specific interaction drivers for the highest ranking top level interaction drivers; to plotting the interaction drivers onto an Affinity Fingerprint canvas to complete the second step of the Program Identity Design process.

Presence Audit Reconciliation

A Presence Audit & Reconciliation bridge is sandwiched between the second and third step to ensure continued alignment between the first two steps to the next and last step of the process. This exercise involves taking an audit (size and strength of community) of all of the owned media presences (Facebook, Twitter, mobile, YouTube, etc.) of the brand and reconciling them with the business objectives from Step One and the affinity and interaction drivers from Step Two to arrive at a set of channels for the deployment of the program that are best suited to achieve the desired program and business objectives. It should be noted that it is possible that the channel that reconciles best with the business objectives and program frame may be a channel wherein the brand does not have an existing presence.

Design The Program Mechanics

The last step is to Design the Program Mechanics. This consists of building out the Platform Map and the Mechanics and Functionality Map. The Program Platform Map is a characterization of the platforms that the program will be deployed on and the Mechanics and Functionality Map is a breakdown of the various program mechanics and functionality and how these and Identity, Conversation, and Community are carried across the deployment platforms.

The result of the above is what we call a Program Identity Map. It provides validation and a roadmap for the execution of the program. Everyone on our team and our client teams that touch the program, touch the Program Identify Map before they start work on their respective tasks. We do this to ensure that everyone has a holistic understanding of all of the facets of the program and can stand confidently behind the reasoning for the execution of the program.

Program Identity Design

Consider that Design = the intentional creation of X. With that in mind, are your programs Designed to have a unique Identity that ensures that the program has integrity across business objectives, consumer wants, and platforms? Does everyone in your organization from your CMO, brand manager, etc., down to your UX design, production, and engineering partners have a holistic understanding of the program and can they speak to the “why” behind each facet of the program? If your answer to the above is yes, then you’re doing it right and are overwhelmingly pleased with the success of your programs. If your answer to the above is no, then there is no better time then the present to add the Program Identity Design framework to your toolbox.  If you have any specific questions on the above, feel free to reach out to me via Facebook.

This post originally appears on the Dachis Group Collaboratory.

Posted in Social Media Tagged , , , , , ,